The Final Truth

A Theory of Practice

The Thirteen Intentions of Creation

• Intention #1 is the principle / beginning of everything: A count can only truly begin with one. Without one, the other numbers cannot exist. The singular precedes the plural.
• Intention #1 only cares about oneness; it does not allow awareness of anything except the one.
• Intention #1 is the origin of the individual (the I). The individual has the penalty of being disconnected from the totality (IC #10) of things, but deep inside he is already a whole unto himself because of his unique characteristics.
• Intention #1 is the simplest Intention of Creation. Everything that is simple and unified is already ideal. There is no purpose in making things more complex if we can keep them simple. In fact, everything that looks complicated has a very simple foundation that has been overshadowed.
• Intention #1 simplifies and facilitates our understanding: there is only one main cause behind an effect not mattering how many different factors are involved. If you are able to find the main / absolute variable of a system, you are able to control that system entirely only through that variable.
• Intention #1, being the leftmost Intention in the sequence, can be considered the inverse of Intention #13. This means that everything that goes against the Thirteen Intentions, which are represented by Intention #13 alone, is focusing on and being attracted to Intention #1. The most common outcome of this inversion is monocularity: to see only one thing at a time and become fascinated with it, and then find another and fall in fascination again only to forget about the last one. Monocularity works in conjunction with Externalization (IC #2) because it automatically requires an external representation as the object of fascination.
• Intention #1 represents individualized nonexistence, nothing as something, zero as one. Since existence only comes with Intention #3, what we have here does not exist: it is It is not really nothing, but also not really something; it is a "nothing-as-something." What intention #1 repreentes by does not exist by itself. This only becomes clearat intention 3 becaue then we can visualize a line (IC #2) dividing the nothingness and thus producing something. because you cannot get csomeinto without creating (IC #3) a constrast (IC #2). and that is whe we have actually something with Intention #4.

• Intention #2 is the duality principle by which nonexistence can be brought into existence (IC #3). Intention #2 breaks the monotony and loneliness of Intention #1 by introducing diversity: now there are two instead of one. Without duality nothing can exist because we need one to validate the existence of the other.
• Intention #2 can represent a line and Intention #1 can represent a point. When the singularity of Intention #1 is "broken" there is separation and division, and this can be thought as representing the manifestation of a line. Therefore, we can say that Intention #2 comes into play exactly when a point turns into a line. A point is precisely nothing, nothing as something. If you do not take a point and do not somehow turn it into a line, which is definitely something, then you are left with eternal nothingness. However, with Intention #2 there is no form of existence (IC #3) or manifestation yet, because a line is by all means invisible and intangible as just an abstract idea.
• Intention #2 is responsible for the dual nature of reality (IC #3). Duality is necessary for something to actually exist and/or to be created (IC #3). For example: the creation of a painting begins with the first significant line drawn on a blank canvas, a line that automatically creates two sides.
• Intention #2 allows for unity (IC #1) after all, but always in detriment of another unity, another one: there can be only one or the other. Intention #2 cannot perceive different aspects as one, but only the difference / contrast between them. Therefore, Intention #2 fails to consider higher non-dual states such as continuity (IC #13), interconnectedness (IC #12) and wholeness (IC #10), and it will see division / dichotomy instead.
• Intention #2 introduces the notion of dimensionality with the first dimension.

• Intention #3 is the power of manifestation, the spark that is necessary for the actual materialization (IC #4) of something. Things at the level of this Intention do not exist except as imagination, as thought forms. A world with concrete forms only arises with Intention #4. We can imagine Intention #3 as the occult (invisible) light that makes all things visible, and thus brings everything into existence. This light energy itself is formless.
• Intention #3 is not Reality, the equivalent of Creation; instead, Intention #3 is the principle that realizes things and thus brings them into reality.
• Intention #3 introduces the idea of electric charge and electric current (circulation). This is how something is first brought into reality: as an electrical signal. If with Intention #2 we had two poles, with Intention #3 there is a third pole that closes a circuit. An electric current can only exist if there is a closed circuit.
• Intention #3 represents an additional geometric dimension: width or height depending on the orientation. Therefore, Intention #3 is when a line becomes a plane: the imaginary expression of nothing into something. However, since a geometric plane is infinitely thin due to lack of depth, it still cannot be perceived by an observer. That is where Intention #4 fits in to give texture to this imaginary plane.

• Intention #4 finally gives concrete form and texture to Reality; it is an actual manifestation of Reality, and not just the ability to manifest / create as in the case of Intention #3. In other words, there is now visibility in the material sense, and not just in the imaginary (IC #3) sense. Reality is no longer just an imagination, but It also becomes visible from a third-person perspective. We now really have things as physical objects right in front of observers. However, all of this is still in the figurative sense, as in a dream, because the real world can only begin when there is life and perception (IC #5).
• Intention #4 is when an idea (IC #1) is finally made into reality (IC #3) as something concrete. Intention #4 is not Reality, the absolute concept, but it equates to what Reality is all about in the end: a system or model that is manifested before our eyes.
• Intention #4 represents the standard notion of reality. Things only become real without a shadow of doubt when they acquire form, depth (three dimensions) and solidity / tangibility.
• Intention #4 builds upon dualism (IC #2) by introducing the notion of observer and observed (object). Considering that 2 x 2 = 4 -> IC #4, we now have duality happening through duality, or duality over duality. This means that in addition to the distinction between two sides (IC #2) now there is also the distinction between observer and observed.

• Intention #5 introduces a new dimension: time, which in turn implies in the possibility of motion (movement perception). Intention #4 could at most provide us with the idea of a dead (i.e., static, motionless) three-dimensional world.
• Intention #5 is life in the broader sense. Although not all objects are living, all of them are alive in the sense that they are energized. All objects in the universe are potentially in motion; all objects have potential energy.
• Intention #5 introduces perception, which can only be sensorial after all. Basically, what a life form does is explore the physical environment around it by making use of its senses. In this context, the humanoid form with its five main appendages (head, arms and legs) and five senses is the most efficient.
• Intention #5 being aligned with Intention #1 on the golden spiral represents therefore a new beginning / principiation, but this time a more potent one like an explosion. That is the actual beginning of life and the universe, ...since Intention #5 is when any kind of force begins.

[Under construction]

[Under construction]

[Under construction]

Intention no. 9

• Intention #9 represents a vortex, an imploding force that sucks things into the spiritual world. As all things fall into this vortex they are stripped down to their core essence. One has to go through the needle's eye, the center of the vortex, in order reach the spiritual world of ic #10 and beyond.
• Intention #9 is a complete inversion of principles because every principle before it in the sequence of Intentions is the inverse of some principle after it. A few examples: variation (IC #6) is the inverse of constancy (IC #13), separation (IC #2) is the inverse of approximation (IC #11), and organization (IC #7) is the inverse of chaos (IC #10). Intention #9 itself is quite the inverse of what Intention #8 represents, being the former based on zero and the latter on infinity. For this reason, Intention #9 shifts the focus from Intention #1 to Intention #13, and this is very important from a spiritual perspective, because Intention #13 is the true spirit of Creation.
• Intention #9 has extremist qualities like Intention #8, but the ideal here is zero, not infinity. There is now a specific concern with spiritual power, not any kind of power. Therefore, Intention #9 marks the beginning of a spiritual journey toward perfection. The spiritual path is a narrow path that requires the practitioner to have great discipline by cultivating his internal energy and developing his awareness.
• Intention #9 is not "less is more" because that is still "more of less," which corresponds to Intention #8 instead. According to the philosophy of Taoism, in the pursuit of Tao (IC #10) every day something is dropped. In this way, the search for less indeed happens through Intention #9, but while one is at it there is absolutely no concern with dropping more; instead, there is only concern with attaining no concern at all. The fact is that there is not really a less; there is only more or lack of concern with obtaining more, which automatically leads to less in a spiritual sense. In other words, less things is not really less, because one can be free of material possessions and still carry a huge psychological burden, as for example when a person believes that she needs to attain more spiritual qualities all the time.
• Intention #9, or spirituality, is often considered unpractical by materialists, and indeed it appears as so if we consider that it follows the Middle Way, the path of less effort. However, spirituality is actually the ultimate practical approach: the less effort, the more power. #9 is actually the pursuit for the ultimate power through which challenges can be overcome with no effort at all. It is a path that is generally taken only after the spiritualist has already gone through the "power trip" and seen it for what it is: an obsession with nothing, because it is in nothing that true power lies. The spiritualist learns to at least be honest in his approach: he assumes an active instance, a direct approach of going toward zero, instead of the passive approach that goes after zero masked as infinity. All the time in itnention 8 the pursuer was trying tor each something by wallking away from it.
• Intention #9 reminds us of the inconvenient fact that the only thing certain in the future of anything is complete destruction. Everything collapses sooner or later, and often sooner than we expect if we consider that the directive Antecipation is also part of Intention #9. For this reason, Intention #9 teaches us about detachment from things. The spiritualist learns that material wealth does not enrich the spirit: the more you have, the more you can lose, and so in reality you never really had anything. There is no real gain and loss. Nothing is ever lost or gained, because the sum always end up being zero.

• With Intention #10, non-duality is achieved. The duality of Intention #2 is completely anihilated, although in reality it is transformed into something else: totality. All things are made into an entirety, a whole. Note that we do not say that all things "form a whole," because in the context of Intention #10 only the whole matters: if there is one thing against another, one thing all by itself, or several things, all of these scenarios are made into a whole. The holistic paradigm seeks to attain a vision of the whole even when looking at an individual part. Therefore, the whole in the context of . assumes a very special role, reason why we cannot simply define it by the sum (IC #7) of its parts; instead, the whole represents more than the sum of its parts, and is more significant than a simple acknolwedgedment that multiple sides coexist.
• Intention #10 is not the same as opposites being unified. Opposites are opposites. The idea that "two becomes one" disrespects the sequence of Intentions because Intention #1 cannot possibly follow after Intention #2. What really happens is that opposites cease to be opposites when Intention #6 enters the picture; they become equal parts instead. Separation (IC #2) is still present in Intention #6, though a common ground, an equilibrium, has been found between parts. It is in Intention #10 that all separation vanishes due to a perspective that sees everything combined to form a particle, and everything merged to create a whole. (Note: although differences between parts also vanish with Intention #10, they do not cease to exist.) The bottom line is that in Intention #6 we see how opposites are equal as parts, while in Intention #10 we see how parts are not really separate insofar as they integrate a whole, and thus they have even more in common than what Intention #6 was able to convey. Therefore, a true identity of opposites is found in totality, not in unity (IC #1) or equality (IC #6), although wholeness refers to a singular (unified) state in the visual sense.
• Intention #10 is all about the big picture, but in addition the picture is also more impressive (intense) than just a picture of all the parts standing next to each other, because that would mean that separation would still be apparent and ic #10 represents complete non-duality.
• Intention #10 represents an entire world in a particle, an universe in a nutshell. A world may contain several different things that are separate from each other, but from the perspective of Intention #10 we see only a particle. Therefore, every single thing that may be inside that world looks like a particle to us,after all a particle is all that we can see. That is why in Intentino #10's context we have diversity in unity at the same instant that we have unity in diversity. We never have only diversity in unity, or only unity in diversity, because in the first case there is bias toward Intention #2, while in the second case the bias is toward Intention #1. We also have totality in unity at the same instant that we have unity in totality. We never have only unity in totality (e.g., "one world"), but totality in unity is acceptable alone. This is because totality depends both on unity and diversity, while unity is independent. When we write unity in totality, we might as well write unity alone and the idea remains, while totlaity in unity if we take unity from it, we miss the idea thatthere is totality in a single unit, and not ordinary totality.
• Intention #10 does not mean we stick parts together with bubblegum and call the result a whole; instead, we merge parts to form an optimal blend that represents the best of all parts. Consider the following: Two substances, one black and one white, are absorbed through a funnel representing the vortex of Intention #9. The resulting substance that spurts from the funnel is a paste with no distinguishable features but that also cannot be considered homogeneous. The paste is not gray, or black with white spots, but an "impossible" color that is completely black and white at the same time. In short, Intention #10 is when a paradox comes to life.

[Under construction]

[Under construction]

[Under construction]

Copyright © 2008-2010 Conspiracy Knowledge Base

You are free to reproduce parts of this work as long as you give credit to the author. When copying parts of this work, make sure to always include a notice identifying the original title and author. You may also distribute this work as a whole as long as you do not add or remove anything from the original content. You may not mutilate the content, or leave off contact, copyright and authorship information. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.